Why science published after April, 2017 is MORE CREDIBLE

Since April of 2017, Pubmed has been standing up for science by publishing conflict of interest information on the study abstract page instead of allowing it to be buried behind an academic paywall.

This resulted from 62 scientists and physicians, and five United States senators petitioning the National Library of Medicine & National Institutes of Health to make public the funding sources of studies. This makes me more optimistic about institutions and politicians — in the news, it seems that all we hear about is how corrupt and incompetent institutions and politicians are but sometimes they act in our best interests!

So it's reasonable to view science published after April of 2017 as a little more credible.

---

I created a VERY CATCHY melodic serenade about the shoddy state of Big Science in modernity…

Support me on Substack? For $7/monthly?

You can pledge support starting at $7/monthly now OR multiply your sunk-cost motivation by picking up a 1-year subscription.

Originally published on LimitlessMindset.com. I'm not a doctor, medical professional, or trained therapist. I'm a researcher and pragmatic biohacking practitioner exercising free speech to share evidence as I find it. I make no claims. Please practice skepticism and rational critical thinking. You should consult a professional about any serious decisions that you might make about your health. Affiliate links in this article support Limitless Mindset - spend over $150 and you'll be eligible to join the Limitless Mindset Secret Society.